<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/xml/rss.xsl" media="all"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Insectnation (Posts about blog science outreach)</title><link>http://insectnation.org/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://insectnation.org/categories/cat_blog-science-outreach.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><language>en</language><copyright>Contents © 2026 &lt;a href="mailto:andy@insectnation.org"&gt;Andy Buckley&lt;/a&gt; </copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 11:21:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Nikola (getnikola.com)</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>Science TV is too nice</title><link>http://insectnation.org/blog/science-tv-is-too-nice.html</link><dc:creator>Andy Buckley</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well well well, another blog post, eh? So soon: it’s only been… erm, two years. Oh. Well I never promised to be
prolific. This one’s come about because I grumbled briefly on Twitter about the nature of (British) pop-science TV and
immediately hit the restrictions of that medium. Twitter is a wonderful way to share neat things that you find online,
and to make pithy soundbites &amp;amp; jokes (and for describing what you’re eating, the form of public transport that you
happen to be on, listing film names with comic vegetable name substitutions…), but for exploring a non-trivial issue
140 characters is, to put it mildly, a limitation. I have difficulty fitting one of my normal &lt;em&gt;sentences&lt;/em&gt; into 140
characters. So of course I came across as a whining idiot, prompting the reply “Yeah, we really should do more about how
shit it all is. You don’t see that tone ANYWHERE” from Dara O’Briain. Well, not remotely what I meant, but who can blame
him? So here’s an attempt at a more coherent and nuanced version that hopefully doesn’t make me come across as an anti-
science, axe-grinding git. But perhaps as a slightly grumpy science nerd, which is fair enough.
There’s been a welcome rise in the amount and profile of science programming  on TV in recent years, a good whack of
which is due to the influence of Brian Cox’s three “Wonders” series’, the LHC start-up &amp;amp; Higgs boson excitement, … and
who knows, maybe it’s also due to The Big Bang Theory. Discounting the mostly-gawp-fest wildlife docs, there’s been
Dara’s own Science Club, Astonomy Live, Bang Goes The Theory, at least a couple of series fronted by my old supervision
partner Helen Czerski… and the long-running Horizon, of course. And that’s just the stuff that I’ve noticed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://insectnation.org/blog/science-tv-is-too-nice.html"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (7 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><guid>http://insectnation.org/blog/science-tv-is-too-nice.html</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>