<!--
.. title: Showing you care
.. slug: showing-you-care
.. date: 2024-02-27 22:52:11 UTC
.. tags: 
.. category: 
.. link: 
.. description: 
.. type: text
-->

I recently did an interview with the [David Hume
Institute](https://davidhumeinstitute.org/) -- through a friend --
about how (or if) personal financial issues affect my work. I won't
forensically document how that aspect went, except to say it was a fun
chat and they are doing good things. But the thing that's stayed with
me is how I involuntarily laughed at the suggestion that my employer
would provide any sort of benefits in addition to pay.

The thought had never even occurred to me! I've used
government-organised schemes through work, like Cycle Plus and
Childcare Vouchers, but the employer is a pretty passive partner in
those. It turns out that a bunch of companies [do actually offer staff
discounts](https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/staff/benefits/) -- as a
loss-leader, of course, and not entirely enticing: I have yet to make
use of my small discounts at Kilt Warehouse or Beauty
Boutique -- and again this is zero-effort from the uni. Virtually
nothing involving the uni actively working to provide better quality
of life for its employees. Should it be?

This brought into relief the contrast I see via engineers I play with
in a band: their employers shower them with subsidised meals,
massages, music tuition, rewards for patents, you name it. It'd be
enough to make jealous, except they also sound like brutal workplaces
in other ways, and despite the overwork and underappreciation,
academia's relative freedom and autonomy is something to be
cherished. But the very idea of a work culture that tries to make
employees feel valued is alien if you've always worked in
universities.

This doesn't surprise me: the UK university sector is in a terrible
bind. Outside Scotland, the switch to funding through student fees at
just over £9000/year led to a pullback of previously index-linked
government funding, and [there has not been political courage to
significantly increase the
charges](https://glasgowguardian.co.uk/2023/09/08/funding-squeeze-imminent-says-russell-group/)
in line with inflation over the last 12 years. In Scotland, [the
situation is even
worse](https://ifs.org.uk/articles/scottish-universities-and-students-are-under-pressure-and-so-scottish-budget#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20funding%20is,per%20year%20since%202009%E2%80%9310.)
as the government payment per student has [not even kept pace with the
rest-of-UK
figure](https://wonkhe.com/wonk-corner/scotlands-he-settlement-means-inescapably-hard-choices-for-universities/). The
sector is [chronically
underfunded](https://www.counterfire.org/article/universities-a-crisis-on-all-fronts/),
full of people working several job's worth of tasks because they
believe in the mission, at a time when increased expectations from
students (on the teaching side) and for project-management diligence
(on the research side) mean we need substantially more staff across
the board. I could also add the intrinsic inefficiencies and perverse
incentives of a system that's evolved to recruit staff primarily for
their research expertise, then drowns them in teaching and
departmental admin, while their research colleagues get used to them
"not being useful anymore". And that genius governmental ideas like
systematic 80% FTE funding of research projects (i.e. systematically
making research financially unattractive) make it impossible to
balance the books without rinsing international students for fee
money.

There is [no
capacity](https://www.itv.com/news/2023-11-13/education-sector-in-crisis-as-one-in-four-universities-make-losses)
[in the university
system](https://www.ft.com/content/0aca64a4-5ddc-43f8-9bba-fc5d5aa9311d)
to make meaningful change, and were I a VC I'd probably do the same:
try to keep the locomotive on the tracks for as long as possible
despite it being chronically overburdened, lobby government in the
background, and hope not to be in charge when the crash comes. But
that fatalism seems even to have propagated to _cost-free_ indications
of caring about the frontline staff. In 20+ years I have never once
seen a VC or dean of college visit a Physics department or take staff
Q&As. How hard would that be, once a year?  I also happened to chat
with a previous vice-chancellor last year during strikes, who enthused
"sensible folk, physicists" at the news there weren't many Physics
staff refusing to mark exams; he, of course, was a perfectly nice chap
but never taught or researched in a university in his life. How would
he know what it's like? Well, he might have asked...

In the big picture, senior management giving staff their time and
attention would say a lot more than trinkets. Or the occasional lick
of paint on our decaying buildings -- I should say that the culture
_in_ departments is generally good, with the infuriating obliqueness
of central management a source of solidarity! But in UK academia, for
now, the old mood music remains the same: keep heads down, be
grateful, and for god's sake keep the paying students coming...

<!--
Quick check \\( \psi \\)
 $$\int f(x) dx$$
 -->
 